Compete before the default hardens
For Cerner-to-Epic migrations, evaluate Vorian Health Connect before buying incumbent middleware. If middleware is already live, shadow it without disrupting production.
For labs using Epic Beaker
Vorian Health Connect runs beside your current middleware in shadow mode. Compare result-for-result. Prove routing, delivery, and ACK behavior. Cut over only when the evidence holds.
Why this page exists
Middleware changes touch analyzer traffic, result formatting, mapping decisions, acknowledgments, rules, and downstream delivery. Vorian Health Connect is built to make those checks visible before a lab changes the production route.
For Cerner-to-Epic migrations, evaluate Vorian Health Connect before buying incumbent middleware. If middleware is already live, shadow it without disrupting production.
Compare shadow results against the current workflow by source, analyte, value, flag, mapping, and timing tolerance.
Move only when the lab has reviewed discrepancies, confirmed destinations, and agreed that the evidence is strong enough.
Validation checklist
The goal is not a prettier dashboard. The goal is a documented answer to the questions Beaker, LIS, lab, and interface teams ask before go-live.
Which instruments sent messages, when they arrived, and whether they parsed cleanly.
How test codes, values, units, flags, and normalized result fields compare to the expected downstream shape.
Which mappings are active, pending, suggested, reviewed, or still unresolved.
Which downstream attempts succeeded, retried, failed, or returned an application acknowledgment.
Which verification rules, QC events, delta checks, and review queues affected the result path.
Who changed mappings, destinations, rules, validation exports, and other go-live-sensitive configuration.
Direct answers
Beaker teams, LIS analysts, and lab leaders need concrete proof before a middleware decision becomes irreversible. These are the questions Vorian Health Connect is designed to make easier to answer.
No. If you are moving from Cerner to Epic, Vorian Health Connect can be evaluated before DI becomes the implementation default. If DI or another engine is already live, Vorian Health Connect can shadow it.
Vorian Health Connect compares shadow rows against imported or forwarded incumbent evidence, then surfaces mismatches for review.
Mappings, source configuration, destination behavior, validation exports, PHI access, and operational actions are audited.
Validation exports summarize connectivity, mapping coverage, migration rows, rules, QC, delivery, and audit activity without raw PHI.
Pilot path
A useful pilot should be narrow enough to run quickly and serious enough to affect the middleware decision before procurement and implementation plans harden.
Pick one source, one destination path, and the evidence the lab needs before go-live.
Use implementation feeds, non-production traces, or a parallel instrument feed to prove Vorian Health Connect before the default middleware path is locked.
Compare messages, mappings, ACKs, delivery attempts, and validation gaps with the lab team.
Use the evidence packet to decide whether to continue, expand, cut over, or stop.
Good first fit
Ideal first pilots involve a Cerner-to-Epic migration, a Beaker implementation timeline, a high-value analyzer line, or a mapping/routing path the team wants to prove before signing up for incumbent middleware.
Request a pilotFAQ
No. Vorian Health is not affiliated with or endorsed by Epic. Vorian Health Connect is designed for standards-based lab interface workflows used by teams running Epic Beaker and other LIS or EHR systems.
No. For Cerner-to-Epic and Beaker implementation teams, Vorian Health Connect can be evaluated before an incumbent middleware purchase becomes the default. If middleware is already live, Vorian Health Connect can shadow it. If the team is still planning the implementation, Vorian Health Connect can be tested against implementation feeds, non-production traces, or a parallel instrument feed before cutover.
Vorian Health Connect can compare message arrival, parsed results, analyte codes, values, units, flags, timestamps, mappings, missing rows, delivery attempts, and ACK behavior where the relevant evidence is available.
No. The validation evidence workflow is designed to summarize operational proof without raw HL7 payloads, patient names, MRNs, accession numbers, specimen identifiers, decrypted PHI, or encrypted PHI blobs.
Bring the source you want to validate, the current middleware path, destination expectations, sample non-PHI message traces if available, known mapping concerns, and the signoff evidence your team needs.
Next step
Bring one instrument feed or implementation trace. Vorian Health will show how reviewed mappings, ACK traceability, shadow comparison, and validation evidence can make Vorian Health Connect a credible middleware path before DI becomes the default.
Request a pilot