For labs using Epic Beaker

Every Beaker install defaults to DI. It doesn't have to.

Vorian Health Connect runs beside your current middleware in shadow mode. Compare result-for-result. Prove routing, delivery, and ACK behavior. Cut over only when the evidence holds.

Production path
Stays live
Comparison
Shadow feed
Output
Evidence packet
Migration Mode
Vorian Health Connect Migration Mode screen showing DI shadow forwarding, conversion checklist, 92 percent migration confidence, matched Vorian Health Connect and DI result counts, and no missing results.
ProveEvaluate Vorian Health Connect before DI becomes the default line item
CompareReview values, flags, mappings, timestamps, and missing rows
TraceFollow ACKs, delivery attempts, and message history
ExportPackage PHI-safe evidence for signoff

Why this page exists

Beaker projects do not need more cutover drama.

Middleware changes touch analyzer traffic, result formatting, mapping decisions, acknowledgments, rules, and downstream delivery. Vorian Health Connect is built to make those checks visible before a lab changes the production route.

Compete before the default hardens

For Cerner-to-Epic migrations, evaluate Vorian Health Connect before buying incumbent middleware. If middleware is already live, shadow it without disrupting production.

Validate result behavior

Compare shadow results against the current workflow by source, analyte, value, flag, mapping, and timing tolerance.

Cut over one source at a time

Move only when the lab has reviewed discrepancies, confirmed destinations, and agreed that the evidence is strong enough.

Validation checklist

What the lab can review before trusting a new path.

The goal is not a prettier dashboard. The goal is a documented answer to the questions Beaker, LIS, lab, and interface teams ask before go-live.

01

Inbound feed

Which instruments sent messages, when they arrived, and whether they parsed cleanly.

02

Result formatting

How test codes, values, units, flags, and normalized result fields compare to the expected downstream shape.

03

Mapping coverage

Which mappings are active, pending, suggested, reviewed, or still unresolved.

04

ACK and delivery

Which downstream attempts succeeded, retried, failed, or returned an application acknowledgment.

05

Rules and QC

Which verification rules, QC events, delta checks, and review queues affected the result path.

06

Audit evidence

Who changed mappings, destinations, rules, validation exports, and other go-live-sensitive configuration.

Vorian Health Connect Validation Evidence screen showing verified messages, test identities, reference ranges, delivery attempts, QC events, inbound ACKs, migration rows, downstream ACKs, audit actions, and routing stages.
Validation Evidence: PHI-safe go-live packet for interface signoff

Direct answers

Questions this workflow is meant to answer.

Beaker teams, LIS analysts, and lab leaders need concrete proof before a middleware decision becomes irreversible. These are the questions Vorian Health Connect is designed to make easier to answer.

Do we have to buy DI first?

No. If you are moving from Cerner to Epic, Vorian Health Connect can be evaluated before DI becomes the implementation default. If DI or another engine is already live, Vorian Health Connect can shadow it.

Can we prove result equivalence?

Vorian Health Connect compares shadow rows against imported or forwarded incumbent evidence, then surfaces mismatches for review.

Can we inspect what changed?

Mappings, source configuration, destination behavior, validation exports, PHI access, and operational actions are audited.

Can we produce signoff evidence?

Validation exports summarize connectivity, mapping coverage, migration rows, rules, QC, delivery, and audit activity without raw PHI.

Pilot path

Start with one instrument feed.

A useful pilot should be narrow enough to run quickly and serious enough to affect the middleware decision before procurement and implementation plans harden.

01

Scope

Pick one source, one destination path, and the evidence the lab needs before go-live.

02

Prove

Use implementation feeds, non-production traces, or a parallel instrument feed to prove Vorian Health Connect before the default middleware path is locked.

03

Review

Compare messages, mappings, ACKs, delivery attempts, and validation gaps with the lab team.

04

Decide

Use the evidence packet to decide whether to continue, expand, cut over, or stop.

Good first fit

Bring a feed that already makes people nervous.

Ideal first pilots involve a Cerner-to-Epic migration, a Beaker implementation timeline, a high-value analyzer line, or a mapping/routing path the team wants to prove before signing up for incumbent middleware.

Request a pilot

FAQ

Questions Beaker teams ask first.

Is Vorian Health Connect certified or endorsed by Epic?

No. Vorian Health is not affiliated with or endorsed by Epic. Vorian Health Connect is designed for standards-based lab interface workflows used by teams running Epic Beaker and other LIS or EHR systems.

Do we need to buy Data Innovations before evaluating Vorian Health Connect?

No. For Cerner-to-Epic and Beaker implementation teams, Vorian Health Connect can be evaluated before an incumbent middleware purchase becomes the default. If middleware is already live, Vorian Health Connect can shadow it. If the team is still planning the implementation, Vorian Health Connect can be tested against implementation feeds, non-production traces, or a parallel instrument feed before cutover.

What does Vorian Health Connect compare?

Vorian Health Connect can compare message arrival, parsed results, analyte codes, values, units, flags, timestamps, mappings, missing rows, delivery attempts, and ACK behavior where the relevant evidence is available.

Does the validation export include PHI?

No. The validation evidence workflow is designed to summarize operational proof without raw HL7 payloads, patient names, MRNs, accession numbers, specimen identifiers, decrypted PHI, or encrypted PHI blobs.

What should we bring to a first conversation?

Bring the source you want to validate, the current middleware path, destination expectations, sample non-PHI message traces if available, known mapping concerns, and the signoff evidence your team needs.

Next step

Evaluate the path before changing it.

Bring one instrument feed or implementation trace. Vorian Health will show how reviewed mappings, ACK traceability, shadow comparison, and validation evidence can make Vorian Health Connect a credible middleware path before DI becomes the default.

Request a pilot